Steering-gear failure emergency response
What is being checked
The inspector is checking whether the emergency plan, crew competence, equipment readiness and recent drills demonstrate a coordinated response to steering-gear or remote steering-control failure, including realistic decisions rather than a paper exercise.
Ready onboard
0/6 completePractice questions
Answer aloud, then open the preparation point.
1What are your first actions for steering-gear or remote steering-control failure?
Raise the correct alarm, establish command and then explain the immediate priorities: change of control, bridge-steering-flat communications, alternative power unit, local operation, navigation warning, speed reduction and anchoring or tug contingency.
2Who assumes command if the designated person is unavailable?
Identify the deputy from the muster list or emergency plan and explain how command transfer is communicated.
3Which equipment must be immediately available?
Identify, locate and explain the readiness checks for main and auxiliary steering, local controls, communications, emergency instructions and rudder indication.
4Show what was learned from the last relevant drill.
Use steering drills, SOLAS test records and defect history to trace one finding through responsibility, correction and verification.
5How are shore and external parties contacted?
Use the scenario-specific contact list and reporting sequence, distinguishing immediate distress or emergency calls from company notification.
Where an observation may arise
The emergency plan did not adequately address change of control, bridge-steering-flat communications, alternative power unit, local operation, navigation warning, speed reduction and anchoring or tug contingency.
Crew members could not explain their alarm, muster, communication or deputy responsibilities.
Required equipment was inaccessible, defective or not prepared: main and auxiliary steering, local controls, communications, emergency instructions and rudder indication.
The record showed attendance but no credible equipment use, decision-making or scenario development.
Times, participants or results could not be reconciled with steering drills, SOLAS test records and defect history.
Repeated deficiencies remained open or were closed without testing the corrective action.
Master's practical note
Select one recent drill and ask three different ranks to continue the scenario from an unplanned complication. Consistent actions are stronger evidence than a polished drill report.
Equipment boundary and references
Equipment boundary: Apply the statutory and company drill frequency and scope relevant to the vessel, equipment and trade. Do not operate equipment during an interview where doing so would create risk.
References
- OCIMF SIRE 2.0 Question Library Part 1, Version 1.0, Question 5.1.12
- SOLAS Chapter V regulation 26
- SOLAS Chapter II-1 regulation 29
Last reviewed: 2026-09-13