QUESTION 5.2.16

Fire-door integrity and operation

Oil, Chemical, LPG, LNGInterview - Deck Officer, Interview - Engine Rating, Engine Room, Forecastle, Internal Accommodation

What is being checked

The inspector is checking whether officers understand the location, coverage, release logic and limitations of fire doors and self-closing arrangements, and whether testing and physical condition prove that it will operate without endangering personnel.

Ready onboard

0/6 complete

SYSTEM PLANApproved drawings and instructions identify coverage, sections, medium source and fire boundaries, hold-back release, self-closing action, latches, seals and remote indication where fitted.ACCESSRelease stations, valves, pumps and isolations are labelled, unobstructed, illuminated and accessible during the intended fire scenario.SAFETY SEQUENCEOfficers can explain alarm, evacuation, headcount, ventilation and fuel shutdown, boundary control and release authorisation.FUNCTION TESTTests prove the complete operating path without unsafe discharge. Records include door-by-door inspections, release tests and defect closure.PHYSICAL CONDITIONPiping, nozzles, cabinets, seals, flexible connections, gauges and power supplies are free from leakage, corrosion or unauthorised isolation.DEFECT CONTROLAny impairment is reported, risk assessed, compensated and repaired with flag, class or shore involvement where required.

Practice questions

Answer aloud, then open the preparation point.

1What area is protected by fire doors and self-closing arrangements?

Trace the approved plan and physically identify boundaries, sections, exclusions and the location from which the system is released.

2What must happen before release?

Account for personnel, raise alarms, isolate ventilation and fuel or machinery as required, then operate fire boundaries, hold-back release, self-closing action, latches, seals and remote indication where fitted in the approved sequence.

3How is the system tested without discharging extinguishing medium?

Use the approved simulation or sectional test and show door-by-door inspections, release tests and defect closure, including alarms, interlocks and remote indications.

4What if part of the system is unavailable?

Notify the Master and shore, establish fire watch or equivalent compensating measures, restrict operations if necessary and obtain repair or formal authority.

5What is the principal failure risk?

Identify and control wedged-open doors, failed closers, damaged seals, unauthorised penetrations or doors that do not latch.

Where an observation may arise

KNOWLEDGE GAP

Responsible officers could not explain coverage, release sequence, safety interlocks or limitations.

INACCESSIBLE CONTROL

A release station, valve, pump or isolation was obstructed, unlabelled or unavailable.

INCOMPLETE TEST

Records did not prove the complete path, including door-by-door inspections, release tests and defect closure.

PHYSICAL DEFECT

Inspection identified wedged-open doors, failed closers, damaged seals, unauthorised penetrations or doors that do not latch.

UNAUTHORISED ISOLATION

A valve, power supply, alarm or automatic function was isolated without formal control.

IMPAIRMENT UNCONTROLLED

A known defect had no effective compensating measure or repair plan.

Master's practical note

Ask the officer to trace the release from the control handle to the protected space. Familiarity with a poster is insufficient if the person cannot identify the actual shutdowns, valves and confirmation indications.

Equipment boundary and references

Equipment boundary: Demonstrations must use the approved test mode. Never discharge extinguishing medium or defeat a safety interlock solely for inspection.

References

OCIMF SIRE 2.0 Question Library Part 1, Version 1.0, Question 5.2.16
SOLAS Chapter II-2 regulation 9

Last reviewed: 2026-09-13