Lifeboat launching and abandon-ship drills
What is being checked
The inspector is checking whether the emergency plan, crew competence, equipment readiness and recent drills demonstrate a coordinated response to abandon ship and survival-craft launching, including realistic decisions rather than a paper exercise.
Ready onboard
0/6 completePractice questions
Answer aloud, then open the preparation point.
1What are your first actions for abandon ship and survival-craft launching?
Raise the correct alarm, establish command and then explain the immediate priorities: alarm, muster, passenger or crew accounting, preparation, safe lowering or launching, engine operation, waterborne manoeuvre where required and recovery.
2Who assumes command if the designated person is unavailable?
Identify the deputy from the muster list or emergency plan and explain how command transfer is communicated.
3Which equipment must be immediately available?
Identify, locate and explain the readiness checks for lifeboat, davit, falls, hooks, gripes, painter, engine, communications and embarkation arrangements.
4Show what was learned from the last relevant drill.
Use official logbook, monthly inspections, drill and launching records to trace one finding through responsibility, correction and verification.
5How are shore and external parties contacted?
Use the scenario-specific contact list and reporting sequence, distinguishing immediate distress or emergency calls from company notification.
Where an observation may arise
The emergency plan did not adequately address alarm, muster, passenger or crew accounting, preparation, safe lowering or launching, engine operation, waterborne manoeuvre where required and recovery.
Crew members could not explain their alarm, muster, communication or deputy responsibilities.
Required equipment was inaccessible, defective or not prepared: lifeboat, davit, falls, hooks, gripes, painter, engine, communications and embarkation arrangements.
The record showed attendance but no credible equipment use, decision-making or scenario development.
Times, participants or results could not be reconciled with official logbook, monthly inspections, drill and launching records.
Repeated deficiencies remained open or were closed without testing the corrective action.
Master's practical note
Select one recent drill and ask three different ranks to continue the scenario from an unplanned complication. Consistent actions are stronger evidence than a polished drill report.
Equipment boundary and references
Equipment boundary: Apply the statutory and company drill frequency and scope relevant to the vessel, equipment and trade. Do not operate equipment during an interview where doing so would create risk.
References
- OCIMF SIRE 2.0 Question Library Part 1, Version 1.0, Question 5.1.6
- SOLAS Chapter III regulations 19 and 20
- IMO resolution MSC.402(96)
Last reviewed: 2026-09-13