Emergency drill programme and records
What is being checked
The inspector is checking whether the emergency plan, crew competence, equipment readiness and recent drills demonstrate a coordinated response to the vessel's required emergency scenarios, including realistic decisions rather than a paper exercise.
Ready onboard
0/6 completePractice questions
Answer aloud, then open the preparation point.
1What are your first actions for the vessel's required emergency scenarios?
Raise the correct alarm, establish command and then explain the immediate priorities: a planned annual drill matrix, statutory frequency, participation, realistic execution and overdue-drill control.
2Who assumes command if the designated person is unavailable?
Identify the deputy from the muster list or emergency plan and explain how command transfer is communicated.
3Which equipment must be immediately available?
Identify, locate and explain the readiness checks for muster lists, alarms, communications and scenario-specific emergency equipment.
4Show what was learned from the last relevant drill.
Use the drill matrix, logbooks, checklists and corrective-action register to trace one finding through responsibility, correction and verification.
5How are shore and external parties contacted?
Use the scenario-specific contact list and reporting sequence, distinguishing immediate distress or emergency calls from company notification.
Where an observation may arise
The emergency plan did not adequately address a planned annual drill matrix, statutory frequency, participation, realistic execution and overdue-drill control.
Crew members could not explain their alarm, muster, communication or deputy responsibilities.
Required equipment was inaccessible, defective or not prepared: muster lists, alarms, communications and scenario-specific emergency equipment.
The record showed attendance but no credible equipment use, decision-making or scenario development.
Times, participants or results could not be reconciled with the drill matrix, logbooks, checklists and corrective-action register.
Repeated deficiencies remained open or were closed without testing the corrective action.
Past observations for practice
There was no requirement to record the details of a drill which included - lessons learned / which contingency plan used / areas of improvement / any RA and / or permits used.
Master's practical note
Select one recent drill and ask three different ranks to continue the scenario from an unplanned complication. Consistent actions are stronger evidence than a polished drill report.
Equipment boundary and references
Equipment boundary: Apply the statutory and company drill frequency and scope relevant to the vessel, equipment and trade. Do not operate equipment during an interview where doing so would create risk.
References
- OCIMF SIRE 2.0 Question Library Part 1, Version 1.0, Question 5.1.1
- SOLAS Chapter III regulation 30
- ISM Code section 8
Last reviewed: 2026-09-13